[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-11-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-10-10 Thread cnstar9988 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 07:28 --- Target Milestone 4.3.3? But this patch didn't committed to 4.3 branch. why closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-10-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 18:50 --- Subject: Bug 36690 Author: jakub Date: Tue Oct 7 18:48:40 2008 New Revision: 140948 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140948 Log: PR debug/29609 PR debug/36690 PR

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-10-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 19:00 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-10-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-08-27 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:04 --- 4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-07-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 12:01 --- Created an attachment (id=15888) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15888action=view) gcc44-pr36690.patch Unfinished patch which solves the testcase in this PR and a couple of other problems, but

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-07-10 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-07-10 13:43 --- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction One problem is that already the into_cfglayout pass does some optimizations I wouldn't think are appropriate for -O0, like merging

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-07-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-07-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 09:22 --- This is caused by the implicit gotos at the end of basic blocks. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01840.html During cfgexpand this can be IMHO fixed by setting curr_location before emitting the jump,

[Bug debug/36690] [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first instruction

2008-07-01 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-01 15:52 --- I've also observed this problem (as causing a number of GDB testsuite failures). With both 4.2 and 4.3, the function prologue is followed by a jump, the loop body, and then the test of the loop condition which the