--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690
--- Comment #8 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2008-10-10 07:28 ---
Target Milestone 4.3.3?
But this patch didn't committed to 4.3 branch.
why closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 19:00 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 18:50 ---
Subject: Bug 36690
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 7 18:48:40 2008
New Revision: 140948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140948
Log:
PR debug/29609
PR debug/36690
PR debug/37
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:04 ---
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36690
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-07-10 13:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] .debug_line first line is behind the first
instruction
> One problem
> is that already the into_cfglayout pass does some optimizations I wouldn't
> think are appropriate for -O0, like mergi
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-10 12:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=15888)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15888&action=view)
gcc44-pr36690.patch
Unfinished patch which solves the testcase in this PR and a couple of other
problems, but sti
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-02 09:22 ---
This is caused by the implicit gotos at the end of basic blocks.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01840.html
During cfgexpand this can be IMHO fixed by setting curr_location before
emitting the jump, no
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-01 15:52 ---
I've also observed this problem (as causing a number of GDB testsuite
failures).
With both 4.2 and 4.3, the function prologue is followed by a jump,
the loop body, and then the test of the loop condition which the jum
11 matches
Mail list logo