[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-10-07 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 09:28 --- Today's commits to the VTA branch fix the undefined references in libgfortran, and other Fortran code containing complex constants referenced in debug info. The patch that fixes it is here:

[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-09-04 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 06:23 --- Subject: Bug 37098 Author: aoliva Date: Thu Sep 4 06:21:35 2008 New Revision: 139974 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139974 Log: PR debug/37098 * cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Handle

[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-08-13 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-13 06:47 --- (In reply to comment #3) Created an attachment (id=16062) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16062action=view) [edit] Patch that may fix the bug Thanks for the report. Wow, I was a bit surprised

[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-08-12 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-12 19:04 --- some vta testing on CP2K as requested in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00160.html -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-08-12 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-08-12 19:25 --- already happens at -O1: gfortran -c -g -O1 all_cp2k_gfortran.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37098

[Bug debug/37098] [vta] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:2519

2008-08-12 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 00:51 --- Created an attachment (id=16062) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16062action=view) Patch that may fix the bug Thanks for the report. Wow, I was a bit surprised this didn't show up building