--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 18:48 ---
Anyway, I consider this fixed. If gdb wants to test also what happens with
such classes in registers, it can always use -O1 or above.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com 2009-03-18 18:01
---
I see I messed it up, in some way was gcc-4.4 more correct than gcc-4.3
Thanks for the fix although now I would not probably bugreport it at all.
It turned PASS->XFAIL.
But in fact PASS means SKIP(not-testabl
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 17:06 ---
Subject: Bug 39485
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 18 17:06:15 2009
New Revision: 144939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144939
Log:
PR debug/39485
* function.c (use_register_for_dec
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 08:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=17483)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17483&action=view)
gcc44-pr39485.patch
Self inflicted pain I'd say, if you don't want something in register, don't use
a register ke
