[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-02-06 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 04:44 --- Subject: Bug 42395 Author: hjl Date: Sun Feb 7 04:41:22 2010 New Revision: 156562 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156562 Log: Backport testcases from mainline to 4.4. 2010-02-06 H.J. Lu

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:51 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:40 --- Subject: Bug 42395 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:40:40 2010 New Revision: 155761 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155761 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42604 PR debug/42395 * tree-vect-loop-m

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-06 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 16:15 --- Mine. Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00267.html The thread is about bug 42604, but the improvements for the fix for that patch fixed this one too. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42395

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2009-12-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 08:41 --- While that change triggered it because at *.ifcvt it causes a difference: : i_41 = j_4(D); - # DEBUG i => NULL + # DEBUG i => i_9 if (i_41 <= 4095) goto ; it doesn't to appear to be the bug, i_9 definitio

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2009-12-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 00:53 --- It is caused by revision 154402: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00623.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42395

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2009-12-22 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-23 00:13 --- Confirmed. It also crashes on i686-pc-linux-gnu if you add -msse2 to the command line. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2009-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot |