http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #33 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-20 05:00:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Fixed with:
2011-06-17 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
Backport from mainline
2011-03-22
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #30 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-17 07:07:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24552
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24552
Make log for gcc-4_6-branch for comment 28
(In reply to comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #27 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-16 06:34:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
I could build avr-gcc from trunk and run couple of simple testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #28 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-16 06:35:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
I could build avr-gcc from trunk and run couple of simple testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #29 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16
13:54:45 UTC ---
Works For Me.
[rth@anchor bld-avr-46]$ size avr/avr25/libgcc/_lshrdi3.o
text databssdechexfilename
244 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #26 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-15
14:40:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
(Assuming that backporting implies the emission of DWARF2 CFI) Is it not
possible to drop DWARF2 CFI feature (which is optional)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #18 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-14 07:00:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 24512 [details]
loosen constraints on register elimination
This seems to fix the problem. At
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #21 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
13:31:47 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jun 14 13:31:43 2011
New Revision: 175018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175018
Log:
PR debug/48459
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:32:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
A full build for AVR fails, but that seems to be related to other
open bugs.
What bugs?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #23 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
19:13:04 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jun 14 19:13:00 2011
New Revision: 175049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175049
Log:
PR debug/48459
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #25 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-15 02:37:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
The testcase at the head of the PR is now fixed.
For the 4.6 branch, this required also backporting
(Assuming that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #12 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 06:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #10)
I don't think initial_return_save() is called now. It passes the
compilation
there but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #13 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 07:13:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
function returns true. As a result, dwarf_debug_frame_expr() is always called!
Typo - dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr() is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Eric Weddington eric.weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #15 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-13 07:55:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Can you change the state to NEW and raise the severity to blocker? I don't
have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at redhat dot com |rth at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24478|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #10 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-10 07:37:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
I agree. But this does not fully solve the problem either.
INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX is being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-10
16:24:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I don't think initial_return_save() is called now. It passes the compilation
there but gets struck in other places. I think it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-09
14:17:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 24475
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24475
patch
Here's an untested patch. Does this fix the problem for you?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #5 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-09 16:54:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24475 [details]
patch
Here's an untested patch. Does this fix the problem for you? Naturally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #6 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-09 17:00:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24475 [details]
patch
Here's an untested patch. Does this fix the problem for you?
I'll try and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24475|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #8 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-10 04:13:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Created attachment 24478 [details]
alternate patch
This patch is probably better.
I agree. But this does not fully
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington
33 matches
Mail list logo
