http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #21 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-09
18:16:06 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 9 18:16:04 2011
New Revision: 173587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173587
Log:
One more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-06 22:38:34
UTC ---
loc_descriptor change in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg01406.html
@@ -14469,7 +15018,10 @@
up an entire register. For now, just assume that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-06 22:43:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
loc_descriptor change in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg01406.html
@@ -14469,7 +15018,10 @@
up an entire
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-06 22:40:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new failures I
had and caused no regressions.
Steve, does the latest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-06 23:04:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #6)
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new
failures I
had and caused no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-05
15:48:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 5 15:48:18 2011
New Revision: 173436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173436
Log:
PR debug/48853
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
07:42:55 UTC ---
Does it fix (at least some of) the x32 issues as well? If some (e.g. ICEs) are
left, please post backtraces and other relevant details.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 13:33:57
UTC ---
I still got
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/alloca-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/alloca-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04
14:06:56 UTC ---
Can you track down on which mem_loc_descriptor call these new
DW_OP_GNU_*_type/DW_OP_GNU_{convert,reinterpret}
locs have been added, and for that post a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 15:37:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Can you track down on which mem_loc_descriptor call these new
DW_OP_GNU_*_type/DW_OP_GNU_{convert,reinterpret}
locs have been added,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24170|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 17:24:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Created attachment 24183 [details]
gcc47-pr48853.patch
Is this better?
No, it doesn't handle DW_OP_GNU_const_type:
(gdb) f 0
#0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24183|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 18:10:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 24184 [details]
gcc47-pr48853.patch
So like this? CONST_DOUBLEs really shouldn't appear in the addresses...
It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-04 19:55:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 24184 [details]
gcc47-pr48853.patch
So like this? CONST_DOUBLEs really shouldn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03
13:53:46 UTC ---
x32 is not a supported target. Do you have something that is reproduceable on
supported targets? ia64-hpux is the only one I think...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 15:02:26
UTC ---
Yes, I am seeing some new failures on IA64 HP-UX. I do not get the stackalign
failures but I do get:
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-local-var-in-ctor.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03
16:04:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 24170
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24170
gcc47-pr48853.patch
This patch should fix var2.c on ia64-hpux - the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 22:15:38
UTC ---
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new failures I
had and caused no regressions.
25 matches
Mail list logo
