http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29
10:12:00 UTC ---
Shouldn't we limit the max of the param then?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-29
10:48:39 UTC ---
But what would be a good limit for the parameter? On some targets some people
have managed to trigger it even with the parameter 20 which has been the
default for a while, but on othe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-29
11:05:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But what would be a good limit for the parameter? On some targets some people
> have managed to trigger it even with the parameter 20 which has been the
