https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
--- Comment #10 from Jaku
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: |[4.7 Regression] FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-19
12:56:53 UTC ---
Then it would XPASS with latest gdb.
With the gdb 7.4.50.20120103-8.fc17 I'm only seeing lots of guality XPASSes on
x86_64 and no FAILs and on i686 again lots of XPASSes and just a sin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-19
12:49:40 UTC ---
Any updates here? Should we simply XFAIL the tests?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
11 matches
Mail list logo