http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Ri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil
2013-01-26 20:28:45 UTC ---
Workarounded with XFAIL for the GDB testsuite:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00655.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2012-12-07
12:06:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > -Og -g0 doesn't produce debug info, so it should fail all debugger tests.
> > -Og -g should work.
>
> -Og -g0 is nee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-25 08:23:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> -Og -g0 doesn't produce debug info, so it should fail all debugger tests.
> -Og -g should work.
-Og -g0 is needed for GDB testsuite which expects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 15:23:19 UTC ---
-Og -g0 is a total failure of everything, such as:
-Breakpoint 2, func2 () at ./gdb.base/return.c:12
-12 return -5;
-(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/return.exp: continue to retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
