https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
I have a fix for that, queued into early LTO debug patches. But the testcase
still fails...
foo (arg7=arg7@entry=30, arg6=, arg5=,
arg4=, arg3=, arg2=,
arg1=, arg8=7)
at
/space/rguenther/src
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yes, see the #c4 partial patch and the following comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
So with LTO early debug I now get proper debug decls but still no locations for
the parameters
<1><1ff>: Abbrev Number: 10 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<200> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x28b>
<204> DW_AT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #14 from Bill Seurer ---
Dominik Vogt, I've noticed that sort of failure in several of the guality test
cases where a test is done at line X but optimization moves the assignment
being tested to after line X. Should the tests be adju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt ---
By the way, I think the value of y should be tested *after* the asm statement
in line 17 not before it in line 16. At higher optimization levels the
assignement may not have happened yet when gdb reaches lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt ---
We've just been looking at this today for s390x which fails these tests for
various reasons too (actually we've located at least four different Gcc bugs by
looking at this test case). Some of the calculation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #9)
> The pr36728 and pr68860 test cases that check the arguments (where the
> arguments are unused) all currently (and for a long time) fail on power.
> They show up a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
>
> Bill Seurer changed:
>
>What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
10 matches
Mail list logo
