https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 12 19:30:00 2018
New Revision: 259353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259353=gcc=rev
Log:
PR debug/83157
* var-tracking.c (add_stores): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Bug now needs new investigation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 12 13:19:23 2018
New Revision: 256580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256580=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-01-12 Richard Biener
PR debug/83157
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
So r224161 (hey Aldy!) caused this bogus DW_AT_abstract_origin and
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c (revision 255167)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Isn't that related to PR68860, where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Isn't that related to PR68860, where because of LTO breaking
DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGINs we don't emit the more advanced DWARF extensions (or
DWARF5) stuff, like DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref etc.?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
I'm quite sure older GCC must be somehow affected - or I'm really curious how
they are not.
While the patch fixes the dwarf for the small C testcase it doesn't fix the
pr41616-1.c execute fail. The dwarf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
A workaround might be in dwarf2out_function_decl push/pop the decl_die_table
like with a "simple" undo stack:
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5
Summary|[8 regression]
13 matches
Mail list logo