[Bug debug/83378] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c xpass

2017-12-22 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- Not necessarily errorneous. In this particular case, we simply lack the ability to tell deja-gnu to expect this to pass at -O0 but expect it to fail at any higher level. We have consciously decided to cope

[Bug debug/83378] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c xpass

2017-12-19 Thread andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov --- Wait, isn`t XPASS an unexpected (i.e. erroneous) pass? I know that XFAIL = expected fail, so I don`t consider it a fail. But what about XPASS?

[Bug debug/83378] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr54970.c xpass

2017-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83378 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-debug | Status|UNCONFIRMED