https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 43442
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43442&action=edit
preprocessed testcase
Nevermind, .ii file generated on gcc116.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I can't reproduce on gcc116.fsffrance.org. The assembler completes in less
than a second for both -gno-inline-points and without.
aldyh@gcc116:~/bld/t/gcc$ ./xg++ -B. -g -O -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -time
po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce on gcc116.fsffrance.org. The assembler completes in less
> than a second for both -gno-inline-points and without.
>
> aldyh@gcc116:~/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Ok. Will do.
On Feb 20, 2018 15:12, "law at redhat dot com"
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
>
> Jeffrey A. Law changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Pardom for taking so long to chime in.
I suspect the source of the problem is the lack of internal view reset
computations. Without that, the assembler gets an uninterrupted chain of
symbolic views, in wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I forgot to mention, compiling with -ginternal-reset-location-views will issue
view resets where GCC would place them if the hook were defined so as to just
return zero, so we can easily confirm whether my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva ---
FYI, the patch I'm working on for PR 84404 will add forced view resets at
function entry points, which should alleviate this somewhat, assuming there's
more than one function in the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84408
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:27:56 2018
New Revision: 258355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[LVU] reset view at function entry, omit views at line zero
Location
13 matches
Mail list logo
