[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-02-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-02-28 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, the bug is that GCC 7's dw_loc_list tail: /* Try to avoid the overhead of a location list emitting a location expression instead, but only if we didn't have more than one location entry in the

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Mar 8 21:50:37 2018 New Revision: 258371 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258371&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/84456 * dwarf2out.c (dw_loc_list): If list && loc

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

2018-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---