https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Jun 30 04:16:16 2018
New Revision: 262268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jun 26 05:44:26 2018
New Revision: 262130
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262130&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR86064] split single cross-partition range with nonzero locviews
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 44266
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44266&action=edit
candidate patch
Here's the patch I'm testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In (i), that loclist format is used because of -gsplit-dwarf, I meant to say.
So we have 3 possible work-arounds immediately available: not using
-gsplit-dwarf, not disabling VTA, and disabling locviews.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
--- Comment #7 from alex_y_xu at yahoo dot ca ---
someone should probably tell Linux to note that in CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT
then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |wrong-debug
Priority|P3