https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 7 12:14:55 2019
New Revision: 272040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-07 Richard Biener
PR debug/90574
* tree-cfg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 89673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Note these issues also appear as coverage errors:
>
> -:0:Source:t.c
> -:0:Graph:t.gcno
> -:0:Data:t.gcda
> -:0:R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Related testcase:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
switch (argc)
{
case 0:
{
foo:;
}
case 1:;
}
return 0;
}
breaking on the foo: line stops.
Fixing this is a two-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We somehow build a broken(?) CFG from the start:
>
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
> ;;pred: ENTRY
> if (argc == 0)
> ;;succ: 3
>
> ;;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code, wrong-debug
Sta
