https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to David Blaikie from comment #6)
> Ideally that'd be detected by looking at the abbreviation table, rather than
> the augmentation string - if parent info is necessary for a usage of the
> table, tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
--- Comment #6 from David Blaikie ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Blaikie from comment #4)
>
> I don't remember filing this bug. At the time maybe I thought it
> would be worthwhile to have "end to end" .debug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
--- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to David Blaikie from comment #4)
I don't remember filing this bug. At the time maybe I thought it
would be worthwhile to have "end to end" .debug_names generation,
that is, to try to have the index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
So if the compiler would emit the .debug_name index would that make any
link/post-processing steps easier or more efficient?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
