--- Comment #1 from peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de 2006-02-25 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=10912)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10912&action=view)
bugfix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26466
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 17:29 ---
Patches goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a changelog. Second please update
the patch to the mainline first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26466
--- Comment #3 from peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de 2006-02-27 09:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Patches goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a changelog. Second please update
> the patch to the mainline first.
>
In the meantime I have realized that this problem is fixed in version 4.0.0
(gcc/C
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-27 14:01 ---
Fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg02011.html
This was not a regression so closing as fixed as per GCC's development guide
lines.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #5 from peb at mppmu dot mpg dot de 2006-02-27 14:49 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed by:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg02011.html
>
> This was not a regression so closing as fixed as per GCC's development guide
> lines.
>
It would be nice if you could
