[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-03 17:37 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-03 17:03 --- Subject: Bug 41564 Author: hjl Date: Sun Jan 3 17:03:38 2010 New Revision: 155591 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155591 Log: Pass -dumpbase and -dumpdir to gcc for LTO gcc/ 2010-01-03 H.J. L

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 17:09 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00065.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-02 11:29 --- Yeah, that looks like a good first step. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41564

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 01:25 --- Created an attachment (id=19443) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19443&action=view) A patch to fix a typo -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 01:14 --- Created an attachment (id=19442) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19442&action=view) A patch lto-wrapper translates /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/bui

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-01 12:31 --- What about -fdump-rtl-* and -fdump-ipa-*? They have the same problem. Note that this still wouldn't get what I would expect when doing gcc -flto -fdump-tree-all -O2 -o t t.c as you'd get a t.c.*.optimized tree

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 21:57 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created an attachment (id=19433) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19433&action=view) [edit] > A patch > > That is what I have in mind. > My patch adds -fdump-lto-tr

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 21:55 --- Created an attachment (id=19433) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19433&action=view) A patch That is what I have in mind. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41564

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-12-30 23:37 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 23:27 > --- > (In re

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 23:27 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as > expected > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > > > --- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail do

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-12-30 23:16 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 21:01 > --- > Since LT

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 21:01 --- Since LTO tree dump is quite different, can't we give it a different command line option, something like -fdump-tree-lto-all, instead of enabling it with -fdump-tree-all? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-04 13:57 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:32 AM, "rguenther at suse dot de" wrote: > > > --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-11-04 09:

Re: [Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:32 AM, "rguenther at suse dot de" > wrote: --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-11-04 09:32 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-11-04 09:32 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-03 20:02 > --- > My /tmp i

[Bug driver/41564] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-03 20:02 --- My /tmp is small so this causes it to be filled up quickly. Is there a simple work around? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -