http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-02 09:22:38 UTC
---
Hi,
you can still test bootstrap with simply commenting out that sorry. It should
give, sort-of, sane results.
I will implement counter rescaling once I get some time for it - it is not
Hi,
you can still test bootstrap with simply commenting out that sorry. It should
give, sort-of, sane results.
I will implement counter rescaling once I get some time for it - it is not too
hard.
Also not too many setups actually train library built into multiple binaries,
so it is not that cri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||42690
AssignedTo|davek at gcc dot gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-02 09:00:51 UTC
---
Hi,
at one point I tried profiledbootstrap and problem is that we can not merge
multiple LTO files
that has been profiled different amount of times. This happens during our
build becaus
Hi,
at one point I tried profiledbootstrap and problem is that we can not merge
multiple LTO files
that has been profiled different amount of times. This happens during our
build because lto1
and cc1 share libbackend. We probably need to add code rescaling corresponding
events...
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 07:47:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -o build/genchecksum \
> build/genchecksum.o .././libiberty/libiberty.a
> lto1: sorry, unimplemented: combining units
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-12-02 07:14:34
UTC ---
With my patch we no longer get the undefined symbols building lto-wrapper,
but instead later on we hit this problem:
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-02 01:58:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think this is a bug in make file rather than anything else. We are building
> libibity with -fprofile-generate but not lto-wrapper.
It looks good to me:
/expo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-02
01:47:47 UTC ---
I think this is a bug in make file rather than anything else. We are building
libibity with -fprofile-generate but not lto-wrapper.
10 matches
Mail list logo