[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2015-09-20 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2015-09-20 Thread rhill at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Ryan Hill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2012-02-08 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #8 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08 21:37:57 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Feb 8 21:37:50 2012 New Revision: 184022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184022 Log: 2012-02-08 Magnus

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-12-18 Thread zorry at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Magnus Granberg zorry at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26124|0 |1 is

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-12-17 Thread zorry at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #5 from Magnus Granberg zorry at gentoo dot org 2011-12-17 20:30:17 UTC --- Created attachment 26122 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26122 switches with separated form -D and -U This patch make the -D and -U

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-12-17 Thread zorry at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Magnus Granberg zorry at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26122|0 |1 is

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-12 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-11 Thread vapier at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toolchain at

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-09 11:28:33 UTC --- Specs are an internal GCC implementation detail, subject to change whenever convenient for implementation purposes. (Whoever put

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-09 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2011-04-09 18:51:20 UTC --- Sorry, i just wanted a trivial example. The actual rule we use is %{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE:%{!D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=*:%{!U_FORTIFY_SOURCE:-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2}}} but

[Bug driver/48524] spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-09 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-10 00:27:28 UTC --- On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, dirtyepic at gentoo dot org wrote: Sorry, i just wanted a trivial example. The actual rule we use is