[Bug driver/57238] GCC passes --gdwarf2 to assembler despite -gdwarf-4 on command line

2013-05-10 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/57238] GCC passes --gdwarf2 to assembler despite -gdwarf-4 on command line

2013-05-10 Thread ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug driver/57238] GCC passes --gdwarf2 to assembler despite -gdwarf-4 on command line

2013-05-10 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238 --- Comment #3 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I don't see how this is wrong. It's wrong to emit dwarf2 because I asked for dwarf4 explicitly. > Mixing dwarf4 and dwarf2 should be ok. Ok for what? One of

[Bug driver/57238] GCC passes --gdwarf2 to assembler despite -gdwarf-4 on command line

2013-05-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't see how this is wrong. Mixing dwarf4 and dwarf2 should be ok.

[Bug driver/57238] GCC passes --gdwarf2 to assembler despite -gdwarf-4 on command line

2013-05-10 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57238 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at google dot com --- Comment