https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Dec 2 07:42:58 2015
New Revision: 231150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Fix PR68029
PR driver/68029
* opts-common.c (prun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #10)
> Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
Could you submit your patch to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org? See
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/ for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #10 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
Will this bug be resolved in 6.0 release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #9 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8)
>
> Good catch! In principle your patch seems correct. I think you are only
> missing a testcase. This patch is small enough to not require a copyright
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #7)
> Created attachment 36638 [details]
> diag_color.patch
>
> fdiagnostics_color_idx can by on first place so comparing as > 1 will miss
> it.
> There shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #7 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
Created attachment 36638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36638&action=edit
diag_color.patch
fdiagnostics_color_idx can by on first place so comparing as > 1 will miss it.
There should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #5)
> I have tested GCC with reverted r228094 and there is not problem reported by
> this bug.
> I'm asking someone with rights to reopen the bug 67640 and lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #5 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> > > What does -### show for the call to cc1 ? My c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #3)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> > What does -### show for the call to cc1 ? My commit r228094 to opts-common.c
> > should have fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
--- Comment #3 from Jiří Engelthaler ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> What does -### show for the call to cc1 ? My commit r228094 to opts-common.c
> should have fixed this.
$ gcc -fdiagnostics-color=never a.c -###
cc1.exe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
