https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #18 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #16)
> This issue has been fixed in FreeBSD's main branch on powerpc* in
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/
> ?id=448c505c33cc334193590f3844406d6a74f26e2a
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
Sergey Fedorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vital.had at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
Piotr Kubaj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Tobler ---
Regarding comment #10, Steve is right with his guess, configure doesn't find
the fenv functionalities needed. The reason is pretty simple, for aarch64 and
powerpc, they are not public. A quick trial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #12)
> Andreas, is this something you may be able to have a look at?
> (It's about the architectures you used to "play" with on FreeBSD.)
There are other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Tobler ---
I try to find some spare cycles to look into. But I can only investigate the
aarch64 part. The powerpcs are gone here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #11 from ripero84 at gmail dot com ---
Thank you very much for the information and your help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:45:12AM +, ripero84 at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #9 from ripero84 at gmail dot com ---
> Steve, is this a GCC bug or a FreeBSD bug (or if it is something else, what
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
ripero84 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ripero84 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:43:28AM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
>
> --- Comment #7 from Yuri ---
> fpu-387.h is in the gcc10 source tree:
> > $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #7 from Yuri ---
fpu-387.h is in the gcc10 source tree:
> $ find . -name "fpu-*"
> ./work/gcc-10.3.0/libgfortran/config/fpu-generic.h
> ./work/gcc-10.3.0/libgfortran/config/fpu-sysv.h
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:56:57AM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
>
> --- Comment #5 from Yuri ---
> config.log doesn't contain the IEEE string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #5 from Yuri ---
config.log doesn't contain the IEEE string even on amd64.
libgfortran/configure.host seems to only enable IEEE modules on i?86 | x86_64
architectures through this code:
> case "${host_cpu}" in
> i?86 | x86_64)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:47:30PM +, yuri at tsoft dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
>
> --- Comment #3 from Yuri ---
> On amd64 gcc installs the file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #3 from Yuri ---
On amd64 gcc installs the file finclude/ieee_arithmetic.mod and on aarch64 this
file isn't installed.
What is installed is defined by the gcc build process.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
--- Comment #2 from Yuri ---
intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic works fine on amd64/i386 architectures on the same
OS.
What do you think is missing/wrong in the OS that causes it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
18 matches
Mail list logo
