[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

2023-05-09 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

2022-01-25 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 --- Comment #4 from martin --- In contrast to gfortran-11, with current master I do not see any errors or segfaults (not even with valgrind) anymore. Seems to have been fixed.

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

2021-06-08 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 --- Comment #3 from martin --- Created attachment 50968 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50968=edit second test case which segfaults Playing around with some variants in select_rank_expression2.f90, I can see that I

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

2021-06-08 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 --- Comment #2 from martin --- It is releases/gcc-11.1.0: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran-11 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=.../gcc/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-repo/configure

[Bug fortran/100961] Intrinsic function as value to a class(*) assumed rank argument fails

2021-06-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100961 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-08