[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

2022-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

2021-08-26 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have run the testcase under the debugger and the longest arguments to sprintf I have found is

[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

2021-08-23 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51348 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51348=edit Partial backport of commit ac932bfcd21e9523fa2b880ae8138aef79da7f54 It's not that the cherry-pick went

[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

2021-08-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/101997] [9 regression] ICE after r9-8665 at gcc/toplev.c:326

2021-08-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101997 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Can you get more details on where the buffer overflow actually occurs? I cannot reproduce it on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu even running f951 under valgrind. The original testcase in pr95091 would have