[Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-08-28 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #53 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #52) > I posted a mostly-finished patch at [1] to restore array indexing of > descriptor arrays. I forgot to add a link for [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/

[Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-08-28 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mikael at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #51 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs

2022-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 --- Comment #50 from Richard Bien