https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
--- Comment #4 from Dalon Work ---
No, I don't think there is more to expect. My mistaken assumption was that the
return value of the function had to be a contiguous array of 8 elements. I
don't find this to be a stupid assumption, since the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It helps to look at the (Fortran) context. As written, the subroutine version
is declared with explicit size contiguous arrays. If the caller has a
non-contiguous (strided) result array, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
--- Comment #2 from Dalon Work ---
Thanks for the information. Based on your comments, I've created 2 new
subroutines that call the "bad" function. The first places the result in a
contiguous array, while the second places the result in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
