[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-25 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-25 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #9) > Steve, > > what do you think about the following patch? Not yet fully regtested. > It should fix the issue much simpler by checking type compatibility: >

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > Well, a boz is typeless, so it cannot be compatible with any other type. > So, I would assume, you could do > > if (ts1->type == BT_BOZ || ts2->type == BT

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:24:04PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 > > --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to kargl fr

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12) > > pr103413-boz.f90:4:6: > > > > 4 | r = z'1234' > > | 1 > > Error: BOZ literal constant at (1) is neither a DATA statement value nor

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:22:47PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED > > --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Submitted: http

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b commit r13-3513-gf7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9831a5f4843b573bbdb2688bbf2de864b4e8be8b commit r12-8875-g9831a5f4843b573bbdb2688bbf2de864b4e8be8b Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2298bd50109e5460e8949290b5337ec28310e91 commit r11-10343-gf2298bd50109e5460e8949290b5337ec28310e91 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b4c9e0658b13b8db6c7f38242ed270cdb8fc932 commit r10-11063-g3b4c9e0658b13b8db6c7f38242ed270cdb8fc932 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-10-28 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-06-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction noted in comment 2 where submitte

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-06-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. > > That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-06-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:11:01AM +, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 > > --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #5)

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

2022-06-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- > I'm not subscribed to fortran@ or gcc-patches@. > Even If I subscribe to a list what good would it > do to send an email? Someone might glance at > it. Then what? I cannot commit as I don't use > git (a