https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #9)
> Steve,
>
> what do you think about the following patch? Not yet fully regtested.
> It should fix the issue much simpler by checking type compatibility:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #10)
> Well, a boz is typeless, so it cannot be compatible with any other type.
> So, I would assume, you could do
>
> if (ts1->type == BT_BOZ || ts2->type == BT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:24:04PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
>
> --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12)
> > pr103413-boz.f90:4:6:
> >
> > 4 | r = z'1234'
> > | 1
> > Error: BOZ literal constant at (1) is neither a DATA statement value nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:22:47PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
>
> --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Submitted: http
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b
commit r13-3513-gf7d28818179247685f3c101f9f2f16366f56309b
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9831a5f4843b573bbdb2688bbf2de864b4e8be8b
commit r12-8875-g9831a5f4843b573bbdb2688bbf2de864b4e8be8b
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2298bd50109e5460e8949290b5337ec28310e91
commit r11-10343-gf2298bd50109e5460e8949290b5337ec28310e91
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b4c9e0658b13b8db6c7f38242ed270cdb8fc932
commit r10-11063-g3b4c9e0658b13b8db6c7f38242ed270cdb8fc932
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.5
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction
noted in comment 2 where submitte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
>
> That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 08:11:01AM +, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
>
> --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #5)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
> I'm not subscribed to fortran@ or gcc-patches@.
> Even If I subscribe to a list what good would it
> do to send an email? Someone might glance at
> it. Then what? I cannot commit as I don't use
> git (a
17 matches
Mail list logo