https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8486c9fd71c08f30273e1a98b86e35a679ca229
commit r10-10364-gf8486c9fd71c08f30273e1a98b86e35a679ca229
Author: Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57b51b8bae4c2ecec3281929f57e4a6a0e6f9ea0
commit r11-9404-g57b51b8bae4c2ecec3281929f57e4a6a0e6f9ea0
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb6a1ebb8585b85879735d0d6df9535885fad165
commit r12-5900-gbb6a1ebb8585b85879735d0d6df9535885fad165
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:13:05PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
>
> --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9)
> "does not work for me" isn't too descriptive.
Well, you fixed a related issue, but not the problem in comment#0.
Try your patch on:
module m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Unfortunately the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:18:46PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
> >
> > ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Unfortunately the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately the patch in comment#5 does not work for me. :-(
Interestingly, the Intel compiler fails on the testcase, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:02:34PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> (In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > > The nearly obvious fix:
> > >
> > > diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > The nearly obvious fix:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
> > index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
16 matches
Mail list logo
