[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-06 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55385f12f604fe242030f0a8fb057598c0f187a6 commit r12-6336-g55385f12f604fe242030f0a8fb057598c0f187a6 Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-06 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057293.html

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-05 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |sandra at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-03 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started most likely with commit r12-3897 by Tobias. Interestingly, the ICE occurs only for a rank-1 array, but not for rank-2 or for assumed-rank.

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-03 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is probably related to my rewrite of the size/shape/ubound/lbound intrinsics back in mid-November. I can add this one to my queue, but I've already got 3 or 4 other issues already waiting

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- In GCC 11.2.0, we had: D.3972 = dim != 0B; mysize = D.3972 ? (integer(kind=4)) _gfortran_size1 (D.3971, (integer(kind=8)) *dim) : (integer(kind=4)) _gfortran_size0 (D.3971); While on the

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-03

[Bug fortran/103898] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

2022-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|