https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fd46d859cda1074125449a4cc680ce59fcebc38
commit r14-9489-g3fd46d859cda1074125449a4cc680ce59fcebc38
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
To fix the parentheses wrinkle, this works:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.cc b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
index eee569dac91..64f61c50c66 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/match.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/match.cc
@@ -1963,6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #11)
...snip...
> I know you had some ASSOCIATE patches in the works, and
> certainly do not want to interfere. Do you want to
> incorporate my patch or some variation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #11)
...snip...
> I know you had some ASSOCIATE patches in the works, and
> certainly do not want to interfere. Do you want to
> incorporate my patch or some variation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:33:51PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9)
> > --- snip ---
> > > % gfcx -o z a.f90
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
--- snip ---
> % gfcx -o z a.f90
> a.f90:5:6:
>
> 5 | x%im = 42
> | 1
> Error: 'x' at (1) associated to expression cannot be used in
> a variable definition context (assignment)
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:24:16PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> Indeed. Bit more reading of F2023, 11.1.3 agrees with you.
>
>11.1.3.1
>
>The ASSOCIATE construct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 07:27:24PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
>
> --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
>
> > (In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> > > Yep, agreed. I went back an re-read the section about ASSOCIATE.
> > > Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #3 from kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
It looks like the 'selector' in this case is an expr.
The expr must be a pointer object or a 'designator'
A designator must be:
R901
designator
object-name
array-element
array-section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114141
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
