https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Linaro flagged up this failure, when I submitted the patch for approval.
Following some correspondence with Thiago Bauermann, this conclusion was
arrived at:
"I ran your patch through a different CI loop that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|powerpc64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 58857
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58857&action=edit
reduced testscase
On x86_64, the attached gives:
[pault@pc30 pr79685]$ ~/grun/bin/gfortran -O3 -m32
../pr102689
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>That stop value is computed so I am not sure which line is generating it.
Well the failure is in check_spread as the stop value is 10+2. and the failure
itself is in:
if (any (a%i .ne. ii)) stop st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note on x86_64, with `-O3 -m32`, this testcase ICEs:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659528.html
rather class_transformational_1.f90 ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|other
