--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
06:31 ---
Subject: Bug 15080
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-17 06:31:51
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite :
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
07:02 ---
Subject: Bug 15080
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-17 07:02:18
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite :
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
11:25 ---
Fixed in 4.0.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 21:37
---
Paul, could you review the patch, please?
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15
21:42 ---
I already did.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01246.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09 12:05
---
Are you going to review that patch, Paul? I don't think anybody else is
qualified.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-29 12:17
---
From the *.t02.original dump, I'd say it is pretty much obvious what's wrong.
compute_inner_temp_size computes inner temporary size as:
D.905 = (int8) v[(int8) i.28 + -1].s;
but computes this before the 3
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-29 15:20
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02960.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-08
15:35 ---
Here's a somewhat reduced testcase that fails
for me on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu:
$ cat forall_5.f90
program evil_forall
implicit none
type t
logical valid
integer :: s
integer,
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-08
20:30 ---
On i686-pc-linux-gnu, forall_5.f90 does the following:
$ gfortran forall_5.f90
$ ./a.out
Fortran runtime error: Attempt to allocate a negative amount of memory.
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-02-28
09:59 ---
Please disable forall_3.f90 until this bug is resolved. It is rather
disconcerting to see a glibc malloc/free error message appearing when running
the testsuite. Since it isn't immediately obvious that
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
22:28 ---
*** Bug 19339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 14:37
---
*** Bug 18915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:22
---
I get this output from the testsuite after upgrading to Fedora Core 3 (I assume
a new dejagnu version is responsible for this):
Running
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27
17:24 ---
This fails for me too on powerpc-darwin:
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_3.f90 execution, -O1
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27 17:37
---
I confirmed that glibc's error is indeed issued when running this testcase.
gdb's output:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003f07a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#1 0x00138955 in raise () from
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27
17:41 ---
The test causes memory corruption, so the actual symptoms are fairly
arbitrary.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15080
17 matches
Mail list logo
