[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2005-06-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 21:00 --- Subject: Bug 16898 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-04 20:59:51 Modified files: gcc/fortran:

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2005-06-04 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 21:00 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||tobi at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2005-06-04 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 21:01 --- The patch has been on mainline since May 18th. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2005-05-18 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 21:24 --- Fixed by Zdenek's recent patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00178.html, keeping this bug open until the patch is also committed to the 4.0 branch. --

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2005-05-15 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 17:50 --- I have on Linux/x86-64 these passes - which means all of them pass: XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90 -O0 execution test XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90 -O1 execution test XPASS:

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2004-12-10 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 13:21 --- This is not fixed. It still fails for me at -O2 in i686-linux. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898

[Bug fortran/16898] Aliasing problem with array descriptors

2004-12-10 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-12-10 13:02 --- Andrew, This one is fixed now, isn't it? It runs fine with the CVS of 20041205 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16898