[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 23:21 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-01-16 23:17 --- Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 > > 16:08 --- > > This is now fixed right? > > Should

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-01-16 16:13 --- Subject: Re: [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 > 16:08 --- > This is now fixed right? Should know in a

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 16:08 --- This is now fixed right? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 15:47 --- > PR fortran/17675 > * trans-common.c (translate_common): Remove duplicate function call. > (finish_equivalences): Preserve alignment when biasing offsets. > testsuite/ > * gf

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 12:06 --- Subject: Bug 17675 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-16 12:05:54 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-common.c gcc

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 23:16 --- > Should be fixed now. Unfortunately not all of them: FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/980628-10.f -O2

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-09 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 22:59 --- Should be fixed now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|R

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 22:57 --- Subject: Bug 17675 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-09 22:57:45 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-common.c gcc

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08 21:43 --- *** Bug 19338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-06 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19292 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2005-01-04 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-04 22:48 --- I don't think that patch is sufficient. I'm about halfway to a fix. I don't think the behaviour should be conditional on STRICT_ALIGNMENT. Either enforce alignment, or annotate things properly so that the bac

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2004-12-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21 00:39 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2004-12-19 Thread phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-19 18:09 --- Sorry for the noise. That patch doesn't do anything. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17675

[Bug fortran/17675] [Regression w.r.t. g77] Alignment constraints not honored in EQUIVALENCE

2004-12-17 Thread phython at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 20:42 --- I haven't tested this yet, but perhaps something as simple as Index: trans-common.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c,v