--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-16 09:10 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul and Brooks
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-16 06:41 ---
Subject: Bug 18769
Author: pault
Date: Wed May 16 05:40:51 2007
New Revision: 124759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124759
Log:
2007-05-16 Brooks Moses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortra
--- Comment #16 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 07:45
---
I was just looking at the gfc_simplify_transfer function, and
it appears it isn't called for the original test program.
Any idea why?
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 19:58 ---
Jerry,
I was not entirely serious - if you want to take it on, great, but... it's a
pain in the beeehind!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 19:37
---
Oh, It was comment 11 that threw me off. Thats why I asked. Let me think
about takingthis on before I do so.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 17:31 ---
Jerry,
See comment #10. The 'problem' is to take the gmp/mpfr representations of the
values in the constructor expression, write them out to form the source, read
then back in binary as the destination, convert the
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 15:38
---
Paul, should this be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #11 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-29 21:36 ---
Subject: Bug number PR18769
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00934.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:43 ---
Now for the hard work of writing simplify_transfer!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 18769
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jun 23 04:46:50 2006
New Revision: 114925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114925
Log:
2006-06-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:31 ---
Subject: Bug 18769
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jun 20 04:30:48 2006
New Revision: 114802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114802
Log:
2006-06-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 19:43 ---
Harald,
The date at which you submitted this is an insult to my sensibilities; I hope
that you appreciate the progress that we have made elsewhere and forgive us
slowness in responding to this? That said, I have been
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 20:54 ---
transfer could be converted over to use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR of the constant but
then again this is in non trans part of the fortran front-end.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:15 ---
The problem here is that we did not reduce transfer to a constant.
Hmm, the problem is fully transfer which is why this fully related to PR 17298.
Looks like we don't currently handle transfer that well.
--
pin
15 matches
Mail list logo
