[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2010-05-10 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-10 11:51 --- James Van Buskirk post: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/7681f2c8f86c4687/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19168

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2005-01-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 12:51 --- Subject: Bug 19168 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-16 12:51:04 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog resolve.c

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2005-01-16 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-16 13:04 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2005-01-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19168

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2005-01-08 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19168

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2005-01-01 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-01-01 21:57 --- There is a patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00023.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19168

[Bug fortran/19168] Mismatched KINDs in SELECT CASE constucts is not handled correctly

2004-12-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-12-27 17:56 --- The relevant promoton rule is found in 7.2.3. In the numeric relational operation x1 rel-op x2 if the types or kind type parameters of x1 and x2 differ, their values are converted