--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
07:04 ---
Resolving as WONTFIX, as agreed. There realy isn't a good reason
to support this.
Thomas
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-27 18:32
---
Downgrading this to enhancement. 27 years of this not being allowed are a long
time.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-27 19:49
---
This is not an enhancement and should be given the WONTFIX status.
Re-read the excerpt from the F77 standard that I quoted. If it
is not an outright error, then consider the implications that
this so-called
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-27
00:10 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Here's a little more info from the F77 standard, Appendix A.
Hmm, people still have fortran 66 code floating around.
/me hides
--
What|Removed
