[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-08-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25 11:58 --- Subject: Bug 20363 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-25 11:57:37 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog decl.c

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-08-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25 12:25 --- Subject: Bug 20363 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-25 12:25:37 Modified files: gcc/fortran:

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-08-25 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-25 12:27 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-08-25 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20363

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-28 Thread erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-07-28 09:06 --- (In reply to comment #12) interfaces. This brings me to a question: what is a named interface? I This is a nameless interface, isn't it? module snafu interface subroutine really_snafu

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-28 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-07-28 10:45 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope Quoting erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The (draft) f2k standard apperantly considers interfaces with names to

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-27 Thread erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-07-27 13:00 --- (In reply to comment #7) Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope Paul, do you have any idea what find_special could be intended for? It seems obvious that it does the wrong thing in the case

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-27 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-07-27 13:21 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope Quoting erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've taken a look at another compiler (i.e. g95). The difference is in

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-27 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-27 16:21 --- interfaces. This brings me to a question: what is a named interface? I This is a nameless interface, isn't it? module snafu interface subroutine really_snafu (foo) integer, intent

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-12 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-12 07:16 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope Paul, do you have any idea what find_special could be intended for? It seems obvious that it does the wrong thing in the case of this PR, and I can't see

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-12 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12 11:47 --- (In reply to comment #8) I do not know. I wondered the same, when Erik could apparently excise the lot without breaking anything. I'm specifically worried that because of the known bad state of generic

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-11 Thread erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-07-11 19:52 --- Erik, Have you checked the parse tree for this? It looks OK, from a very casual look, but the parse tree would be the clincher. After comments from Tobi I posted a new patch here:

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-11 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-11 20:02 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope That seems to be as good as one could want! Paul T -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20363

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-11 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-07-11 20:12 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote: --- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-11 20:02 ---

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 15:37 --- Erik has posted a patch for this bug here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-07/msg00081.html i'm looking into it, but I haven't yet understood how this changes something, and I'm currently rebuilding the

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-07-10 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-10 16:57 --- Subject: Re: interface body has incorrect scope tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 15:37 --- Erik has posted a patch for this

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-12 17:29 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/20363] interface body has incorrect scope

2005-03-07 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-03-07 18:40 --- (In reply to comment #0) Sorry about that I was adding Michael Metcalf to the cc and it, well, went. $ cat snafu.f90 module snafu interface foo subroutine really_snafu (foo) integer,