--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 04:13
---
*** Bug 28091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23091
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-11 22:36 ---
Cracked on trunk and 4.1.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-11 22:32 ---
Subject: Bug 23091
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jun 11 22:32:26 2006
New Revision: 114551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114551
Log:
2006-06-12 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-07 07:20 ---
Subject: Bug 23091
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 7 07:20:39 2006
New Revision: 114461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114461
Log:
2006-06-07 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-06 22:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR23091
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00332.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-06
14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=11608)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11608&action=view)
Patch for this and PR27583
This needs cleaning up and a testcase writing but it is nearly there.
P
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 23:25 ---
*** Bug 27583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 14:18 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> same (?) bug on GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060104
Yes this is the same bug, we should not promote variable length (hopefully that
is the correct term) arrays to save/static (a C/GCC ter
--- Comment #6 from mimo2 at free dot fr 2006-01-05 13:41 ---
same (?) bug on GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060104
program test
call toto(4)
end
subroutine toto(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
real :: tab(n)
tab(1:n) = 4.
end
this code compiles when no option, but fails when -fno-autom
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 06:44 ---
*** Bug 25105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 04:43 ---
I see this with -fno-automatic in a benchmark.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27
12:59 ---
Confirmed. The following still ICE's (4.0 branch and mainline)
==
Subroutine My(n1)
Dimension myArray(n1)
Save myArray
Call xxx(myArray)
End
==
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27
12:53 ---
Well, not qiote a duplicate: "Save myArray" still ICE's.
Reopening.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27
12:50 ---
This is a duplicate of PR 21034 and already fixed for gcc 4.0.2.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21034 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
15 matches
Mail list logo
