[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-04 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:29 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:26 --- Subject: Bug 23661 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-04 12:25:46 Modified files: gcc/fortran: Change

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-04 12:09 --- Subject: Bug 23661 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-04 12:08:53 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog io.c gcc/testsuite

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-01 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 14:40 --- For the record: I accidentallz attached an old version of the third testcase which doesn't yet have the correct dg-annotations: the first dg-error should be removed, the second turned into a dg-warning. --

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 12:16 --- Oops. Would that be Paul T's patch to have "PRINT namelist" work? Thanks Tobi for the fix! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-09-01 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-01 12:10 --- Turns out FX approved the culprit patch :-) Anyway, I'm testing a fix. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-08-31 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 23:11 --- (I understood this between my mail to the list, and writing the previous comment, in case you're wondering about the discrepancy :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23661

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-08-31 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 23:10 --- What happens is this: In match_io we have the following code if (gfc_match_char ('(') == MATCH_NO) { /* Treat the non-standard case of PRINT namelist. */ if (k == M_PRINT && (gfc_match_name

[Bug fortran/23661] 'print fmt' is unclassifiable statement in gfortran

2005-08-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 19:49 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E