[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 22:51 --- Fixed on mainline and 4.0. -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 22:50 --- Subject: Bug 24534 Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 6 22:50:38 2005 New Revision: 106572 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106572 Log: 2005-11-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-06 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 20:05 --- Subject: Bug 24534 Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 6 20:05:12 2005 New Revision: 106567 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106567 Log: 2005-11-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 17:22 --- > > This is clearly nonsense. Although the type "my_t" is PUBLIC, > its components are not. > No, this is not nonsense, just incorrect. See PR16404 and the discussion about test #6. I have incompletely applied the

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 11:06 --- Yes, I have been too strict. The private derived type must be accessible inside the module where it is defined (4.4.1). I'll have a patch ready before the weekend is out. Thanks Harald! Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-05 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-11-05 10:51 --- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:22 --- >CCing pault, as he

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-11-01 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:22 --- CCing pault, as he introduced that error. Looks like you've been to strict, Paul -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-10-31 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2005-10-31 08:09 --- (In reply to comment #2) > How can this possibly be a GCC 4.0/4.1 regression?! It works with a GCC 4.1.0 20050913 snapshot, but not recent ones. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24534

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-10-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5 Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-10-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-29 15:20 --- (In reply to comment #2) > How can this possibly be a GCC 4.0/4.1 regression?! Because in 4.0.0, this worked. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/24534] [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types with private components

2005-10-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 16:59 --- Confirmed, There might be just some missing check for this. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -