--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 22:51 ---
Fixed on mainline and 4.0.
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 24534
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 6 22:50:38 2005
New Revision: 106572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106572
Log:
2005-11-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 20:05 ---
Subject: Bug 24534
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 6 20:05:12 2005
New Revision: 106567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106567
Log:
2005-11-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 17:22 ---
>
> This is clearly nonsense. Although the type "my_t" is PUBLIC,
> its components are not.
>
No, this is not nonsense, just incorrect. See PR16404 and the discussion about
test #6.
I have incompletely applied the
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-05 11:06 ---
Yes, I have been too strict. The private derived type must be accessible
inside the module where it is defined (4.4.1).
I'll have a patch ready before the weekend is out.
Thanks Harald!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-11-05 10:51 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] PUBLIC derived types
with private components
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:22 ---
>CCing pault, as he
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:22 ---
CCing pault, as he introduced that error. Looks like you've been to strict,
Paul
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2005-10-31 08:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> How can this possibly be a GCC 4.0/4.1 regression?!
It works with a GCC 4.1.0 20050913 snapshot, but not recent ones.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24534
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-29 15:20 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> How can this possibly be a GCC 4.0/4.1 regression?!
Because in 4.0.0, this worked.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-26 16:59 ---
Confirmed, There might be just some missing check for this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
11 matches
Mail list logo