https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state.
Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not
DW_ATE_unsigned_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 49565, which changed state.
Bug 49565 Summary: character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not
DW_ATE_unsigned_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 37826, which changed state.
Bug 37826 Summary: gfortran emits incorrect debug information if compiled with
-finit-local-zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37826
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 87969, which changed state.
Bug 87969 Summary: -fcheck does not raise signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87969
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 77865, which changed state.
Bug 77865 Summary: Regression: wrong debug information for gfortran pointers to
structures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77865
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 63331, which changed state.
Bug 63331 Summary: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 40040, which changed state.
Bug 40040 Summary: gfortran invalid DW_AT_location for overridable variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40040
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 78059, which changed state.
Bug 78059 Summary: Pointer to variable length array, debug info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 71906, which changed state.
Bug 71906 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Fortran allocatable strings debug info type
size regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71906
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 68889, which changed state.
Bug 68889 Summary: Fortran/DWARF: Possible bug in the handling of
DW_AT_associated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68889
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Hi FX,
>
> are you planning to submit that patch? It sounds like a good idea.
This patch seems to have been committed at least since 4.7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 41143, which changed state.
Bug 41143 Summary: Support DW_TAG_common_inclusion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41143
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 37132, which changed state.
Bug 37132 Summary: Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 29697, which changed state.
Bug 29697 Summary: gfortran should use TYPE_QUAL_CONST etc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29697
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
Bug 24546 depends on bug 23280, which changed state.
Bug 23280 Summary: gfortran does not emit DW_AT_entry_point (dwarf-2) debugging
info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23280
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-20 22:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
PS: as a minor improvement, we might want to give numeric types a more
Fortran-like name, with a patch such as the following:
...
Hi FX,
are you planning to submit that patch? It
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-03 12:06
---
Steven Bosscher had made significant progress on this, IIRC. Steven, what's the
status of your patches?
PS: as a minor improvement, we might want to give numeric types a more
Fortran-like name, with a patch such
--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 16:01 ---
Just as a general note, the deadline for dwarf3 comments is Dec 1, 2005. So if
anyone with some clue about how to improve support for debugging fortran has
some good suggestions that would require changes in the debug
--- Comment #6 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-11-22
03:49 ---
I ever opened an issue to request to add something to identify the main
function (such as Fortran MAIN__) in a program. But that is deferred to DWARF
4. So maybe now it is too late to add anything into
--- Comment #4 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-11-11
09:18 ---
Hi Andrew,
I opened PR 24790 to track this. Wish that it is just what you thought of.
But I didn't figure out how to assign that to you. So I add you the cc list.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
--
woodzltc at
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 04:04 ---
There is a gfortran bug not listed here yet (I am too lazy to file a new bug).
Anyways the bug is that the type for arguments is wrong and gives you instead a
reference (in the C++ sense) type instead of a normal
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 23:32 ---
From the looks of it, some of these are really gdb issues as they work when you
do:
set lang c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
--- Comment #2 from woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-10-28
04:51 ---
Yes. Some of these problems stems from gdb, like 24527; others from gfortran,
like 22244, and yet others involve both.
I could spare some time to work on fortran support in gdb. And very willing to
work
24 matches
Mail list logo
