[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:15 --- *** Bug 22048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:11 --- Fixed. -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 23:10 --- Subject: Bug 24643 Author: tobi Date: Thu Nov 10 23:10:51 2005 New Revision: 106757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106757 Log: Backport r106753 fortran/ PR fortran/24643 * primary.c (match_var

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 21:49 --- Subject: Bug 24643 Author: tobi Date: Thu Nov 10 21:49:29 2005 New Revision: 106753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106753 Log: fortran/ PR fortran/24643 * primary.c (match_varspec): Check for i

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-08 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:58 --- Patch posted. -- tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|toon at

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-08 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 20:55 --- Correction: implicit types are only assigned during resolution. The issue is: why does it reject the second statement if the RHS object already exists, but not otherwise? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-07 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Comment #9 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2005-11-07 23:43 --- Subject: Re: Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 23:29

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-07 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 23:29 --- We get to "check_substring:" in match_varspec: PROGRAM P IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8 (Y) YLOCAL='A' YBTABLE=YLOCAL(1:2) END check_substring: if (primary->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-05 Thread toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
--- Comment #7 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2005-11-05 11:51 --- I got some preliminary results from debugging. By -fdump-parse-tree, YLOCAL does have the correct (implicitly determined) type of CHARACTER*8 at statement "YLOCAL='A'". However, by the time we reach gfc_ma

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-03 Thread toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
--- Comment #6 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2005-11-03 19:34 --- Mine ! All Mine ! -- toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-02 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 22:12 --- (In reply to comment #3) > ... I forgot to say that these are all syntactically valid variations of the same theme. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24643

[Bug fortran/24643] Unclassifiable statement on implicitly typed character substring

2005-11-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 21:13 --- g77 groks this: $ cat grg.f PROGRAM TABLES IMPLICIT CHARACTER*8(Y) WRITE(YLOCAL,'(I2.2)') ILOCAL YBTABLE=Ylocal(1:2) END $ g77 grg.f $ -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: