[Bug fortran/24886] different character length in actual and formal argument not detected

2009-04-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-20 11:57 --- (In reply to comment #10) Paul, can we close this one? Absolutely! It's done. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24886] different character length in actual and formal argument not detected

2009-04-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 21:35 --- With the commit in comment #9 we get: $ gfortran-svn -fwhole-file -Wall pr24886.f [...] pr24886.f:8.20: call foo(x) 1 Warning: Character length of actual argument shorter than of

[Bug fortran/24886] different character length in actual and formal argument not detected

2009-03-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 19:35 --- Subject: Bug 24886 Author: pault Date: Mon Mar 30 19:35:14 2009 New Revision: 145314 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145314 Log: 2009-03-30 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug fortran/24886] different character length in actual and formal argument not detected

2009-01-03 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 19:08 --- Runtime checking is PR 37746, BTW, I'm working on it and have a pending patch. Would this fix this bug or should we wait for the whole-file checking? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24886

[Bug fortran/24886] different character length in actual and formal argument not detected

2007-06-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 22:09 --- [Compile-time checking] I think this was fixed a while ago - at least for contained procedures. If not it is then definitely fixed (for contained procedures) by my patch for PR30940: Character length of actual