--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25030
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 05:52 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 05:45 ---
Subject: Bug 25030
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 30 05:45:06 2006
New Revision: 110394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110394
Log:
2006-01-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 06:08 ---
Subject: Bug 25030
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 29 06:08:07 2006
New Revision: 110365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110365
Log:
2006-01-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 05:32 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I believe the code is illegal from 7.5.2, page 110,
>
>Constraint: The target shall be of the same type, kind type parameters,
> and rank as the pointer.
>
> Then on pa
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 16:12 ---
I believe the code is illegal from 7.5.2, page 110,
Constraint: The target shall be of the same type, kind type parameters,
and rank as the pointer.
Then on page 111, you find "The target shall ha
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 10:04
---
This was fixed at some point, since current gfortran mainline (4.2) does it the
way you want:
$ gfortran u.f90 && ./a.out
test string
But indeed, Intel output a garbage string, g95 and Sun f90 reject the code
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 00:48 ---
Hmm, IFC does the same thing as gfortran.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25030
