[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-20 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-20 13:49 --- This fixes the problem: Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c === --- gcc/fortran/primary.c (révision 114599) +++ gcc/fortran/primary.c

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 23:45 --- The line + sym->attr.flavor = FL_UNKNOWN; breaks too much - mainly intrinsics. + sym->attr.flavor = FL_PROCEDURE; is in the final stages of regtesting, as I head off to bed. It looks OK. Paul --

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 20:39 --- Here's the patch (or rather, one of three that I have found!): Paul Index: gcc/fortran/primary.c === *** gcc/fortran/primary.c (revision 114823) -

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:13 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-02-02 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 19:12 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: kargl Date: Thu Feb 2 19:11:58 2006 New Revision: 110517 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110517 Log: 2006-02-02 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fort

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-02-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:32 --- Subject: Bug 25072 Author: kargl Date: Fri Feb 3 21:32:14 2006 New Revision: 110560 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110560 Log: 2006-02-03 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul

[Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All

2006-02-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 21:37 --- I've committed a patch to both 4.1 and trunk that fix the ICE. The actual problem that PR raises is still open. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25072