--- Comment #18 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 17:19
---
Subject: Bug 25716
Author: eedelman
Date: Fri Jan 27 17:19:36 2006
New Revision: 110302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110302
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-27 Erik Edelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 20:59
---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 25716
Author: eedelman
Date: Wed Jan 25 20:46:29 2006
New Revision: 110225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110225
Log:
fortran/
2005-01-25 Erik Edelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 20:37
---
(In reply to comment #15)
Any chance of getting the fix into 4.1?
Yes if someone approves the patch. Which was posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00785.html
I don't know enough of this code
--- Comment #15 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 23:10
---
This testcase also fails on s390x-ibm-linux (crash of f951).
The patch in comment 13 fixes the crash.
Any chance of getting the fix into 4.1?
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 11:30
---
Created an attachment (id=10645)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10645action=view) [edit]
Improved patch
Works For Me(tm).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25716
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 08:22
---
Attached a patch that fixes the problem on x86 and a cross-compiler to
sparc64. I intend to contemplate it a bit further before I post it to the
list for review.
It doesn't seem to work for me (on the 4.1
--- Comment #10 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:38
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Attached a patch that fixes the problem on x86 and a cross-compiler to
sparc64. I intend to contemplate it a bit further before I post it to the
list for review.
It doesn't
--- Comment #11 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 15:40
---
Created an attachment (id=10640)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10640action=view)
Improved patch
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 17:25
---
Created an attachment (id=10640)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10640action=view) [edit]
Improved patch
The testsuite is now clean again, both on 32-bit and 64-bit SPARC. Thanks!
--
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 23:22
---
Created an attachment (id=10645)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10645action=view)
Improved patch
After some more testing, I found out that the previous patch still failed in
some cases.
--
--- Comment #8 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 00:12
---
Created an attachment (id=10639)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10639action=view)
Patch to fix the bug.
Attached a patch that fixes the problem on x86 and a cross-compiler to sparc64.
I
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 12:32
---
According to the mail http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-01/msg00123.html, it
fails on x86-64 and SPARC64 too. I don't see the error on Linux/x86.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 12:48
---
I see it on SPARC64 and x86-64.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2006-01-10
13:04 ---
Also, very telling, it fails for s390x-ibm-linux-gnu (64 bits) and *not* for
s390-ibm-linux-gnu (32 bits).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25716
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-10 13:08 ---
I can reproduce it with a native compiler for powerpc-darwin but with -m64
which enables LP64 powerpc-Darwin. It is a segfault writting out the module.
Backtrace:
#0 0x00052ce0 in mio_symtree_ref (stp=0x42909e3c)
--- Comment #5 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 03:18
---
Also fails on ia64-linux-gnu. This is the ruduced case:
module cutils
implicit none
private
type t
integer :: kk(3) = (/30, 40, 50 /)
end type t
integer :: n8 = 3
type(t) :: tt2
public :: IntToChar7
--- Comment #6 from fengwang at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 03:38
---
And the backtrace:
#0 mio_expr (ep=0x60033298)
at ../../gcc-4.2-20051231/gcc/fortran/module.c:1472
#1 0x4007caa0 in mio_charlen (clp=0x600fc0a8)
at
18 matches
Mail list logo
