[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 23:21 --- Fixed on 4.1, too. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 23:20 --- Subject: Bug 25756 Author: kargl Date: Fri Feb 10 23:20:10 2006 New Revision: 110856 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110856 Log: 2006-02-10 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR for

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-13 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-01-13 22:20 --- Subject: Re: ICE on valid code with labels On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:15:13PM -, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > Should the warning be made consistent between fixed- and free form? >

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-13 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 22:15 --- Should the warning be made consistent between fixed- and free form? Both the gfc_warning vs. gfc_warning_now and the strings are not consistent. Fixed Form has: gfc_warning ("Statement label in blank line will be ign

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 21:10 --- Committed the fix to trunk. I'll wait a few days for 4.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 21:09 --- Subject: Bug 25756 Author: kargl Date: Fri Jan 13 21:09:24 2006 New Revision: 109674 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109674 Log: 2006-01-13 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fort

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-12 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 22:42 --- I have a patch. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unas

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
--- Comment #6 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-01-12 22:41 --- Subject: Re: ICE on valid code with labels On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:18:50PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > get rids of the ICE, but I don't understand why we have an ICE in firs

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-12 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 20:18 --- The following simple patch Index: parse.c === --- parse.c (revision 109606) +++ parse.c (working copy) @@ -349,8 +349,10 @@ next_free (void)

[Bug fortran/25756] ICE on valid code with labels

2006-01-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:41 --- Confirmed. (well already via IRC). Note you will not get this email for a while anyways. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -